I respect you Subicman.... but I disagree.
He took what a provider told him - and put it out there as gospel. Thats just wrong.
I do agree with you that
he should have gone to whomever
he is talking about - instead of being vague.
If I was at fault for anything - it was calling him names. That was childish and I apologize for that.
But there is no conspiracy on this site about removing his review. And the information
he posted - was wrong. And his "information" makes the manager look bad - for no good reason. And thats wrong, too. The reasons
he gave for the girls "firing" - if you want to call it that - also wrong.
What IS true - is that
he and I are obviously close to opposite sides of the situation - and the reality is that either, or both of us could have been duped. But I would not think of throwing out what I know - without knowing it was true. Not in a public forum.
Also true - and sad - is the fact that up until now - this city HAS been banded as one , more or less - for the common good of the hobbyists as a whole. There have been small disagreements and lack of communication before - but not on this scale that i can remember in the short, few years I have been on here.
Also true..... Just having Kal toss out what
he thinks
he knows - and who
he thinks did him wrong.... doesnt make it truth either. That goes for anyone on here. And its not worth tarnishing someones good name - purely on his suspicions. The first response of most posters here is to pre-judge - and jump on the condemning bandwagon without thought to whether or not its true. Kal's status here as a man with many reviews - and much research - is all well and good.
He deserves the reputation
he has earned. But I felt , in this case -
he was wrong, and since no one else was sticking up for the manager - I did, because as I said - I am close to the situation at that particular place and believe I have the facts as they are.
This whole topic - should have been handled man to man - on an internal level. Not posted here for people to take sides - depending on who they know better.