Incorrect credentials.
beverett975
02/04/2010 04:59 am

posts: 0

Has anyone ever used a visa or Master card for the room not the tip and how was it billed.
eroticmp
02/04/2010 09:04 am

posts: 0

Yes, depends on each MP. You have to ask the MP how its billed. You can use any name you want on a merchant account, but if you don't tell your CC processor the name you want it usually defaults to the Corporation name. Most MP owners are clever & usually will use a ubiquitous name.
Brahmabull
02/04/2010 02:28 pm

posts: 0

I have many times and AMPhunter is right. It shows up pretty plain, nothing with Massage in the name. I believe at Beltsville it showed up something like Beltsville AC. I have used it several other places and had things like "Someone's name, LLC" or "Lastname Associates, INC".
A couple times, since they charge you more on the CC and often do not tell you (5.00-15.00 some places, Beltsville is 2.00 last time I charged) look when you sign the receipt, I could not remember that I charged it and was wondering where this 75.00 to "Smith Associates, INC" was for. I almost disputed the charges. Luckily for me I eventually remembered I went that day

jj14921
02/05/2010 06:33 am

posts: 0

Rock and the hunter are correct. So, it will usually not raise any read flags with the SO...but, it is a record that LE is usually privy to when a spa is busted. They don't try to distinguish between who just got a massage or not...everyone is presumed guilty.

Food for thought...especially for those who are concerned about the charges coming back to haunt them.
Brahmabull
02/05/2010 07:08 am

posts: 0

Well the problem with LE is they have to prove I used the card to get a massage for ME. I could have easily paid for a friend as a gift, and gone off shopping somewhere while he or she received service.

But these spa owners usually have a single CC Merchant account which is used by several of their businesses, it is possible that the charge was from his flower shop or resturant.

Have not seen 1 time in this area when a spa was busted the cops even try to find previous customers to make their case. They go with the UC experience and what ever they discover when they raid the place, ie caught mr X doing xxx with ms. Y. It is usually enoungh to get their job done, which is to close the place down, they really do not want to put people in jail behind it, neither does the DA. They just want to shut the place down, and move on. After the owner loses his license he usually can't get licensed again at least in that same county using his name...
apache2
02/05/2010 11:12 am

posts: 0

jj1492 wrote:
Rock and the hunter are correct. So, it will usually not raise any read flags with the SO...but, it is a record that LE is usually privy to when a spa is busted. They don't try to distinguish between who just got a massage or not...everyone is presumed guilty.

Food for thought...especially for those who are concerned about the charges coming back to haunt them.
. Innocent till proven guilty. Even though they have it on record(receipts), they still have to prove "reasonably beyond doubt" that a sexual service was done with you(video or caught in the act would be 2 ways). For example,Sure there could be a receipt for a 1/2 massage for $50, then a $40 tip, but one can say it was a tip($40) for a great massage. Now if the tip was $60-$80($140), just say you decided to extend the massage for another 1/2 hour, but you had to pay full price again(2-1/2 massages=$100) plus a $40 tip. .
oinkstrategy
10/23/2023 01:01 am

posts: 5

The hunter and Rock are correct. As a result, x trench run normally does not raise any read flags with the SO...but it is a record that LE usually has when a spa is smashed. They don't care if you just received a massage or not...everyone is assumed guilty.
shfulbecomin
05/27/2024 03:25 am

posts: 1

It typically does not trigger any read flags with the SO; however, the LE is typically informed of this record whenever a phrazle spa is raided. Without making any differentiation regarding who has recently received a massage, all individuals are presumed culpable.
To reply to this topic, register for free on Adultsearch.com