Non erotic reviews should no be removed. Otherwise guys would continue to visit them and waste money.

The purpose of the site is to help us decided where to go and where not to go. You need good and bad reviews to do that, you need emp and non emps identified to do that.

A bit of discretion may be good in the review. Nobody really cares how often your boys got brushed. For the sake of all involved just stating that it met the requirements of an EMP or didn't should be sufficient. Since everyone receives different experiences from an establishment, full detail isn't really necessary.

Based upon the trolls who have been posting here recently, it is probably more important to confront a lie when you see it. If you see a review where someone mentions getting a table shower where there is no table shower speak up. If someone reports getting more than a massage at a place that is known for just giving massages set the record straight. There is no need to expose a provider to needless attention of folks outside the hobby. I want the people I interact with to be as safe as possible.

I think gentlemen need to know and its reasonable to have them listed.
I agree discretion is key here.

More than anything, I was referring to ones that have like 5 or more reviews and not a single one was more than a massage.

5 or more with nothing more than a massage sounds like a non-emp pattern to me. Constant turnover suggests at least the promise of something different. The risk/reward factor comes into play in that situation. If the odds aren't to your liking, there are still a lot of sure things out there. Personally, I prefer the hunt. The worst thing is that I may get a bad massage, but I may get a really good massge and a prize. At the end of the day, it is a fun hobby.

As long as parlors advertise their masseuses as young, pretty and show photos of them scantilly dressed it is worth keeping them listed if they are non erotic to eliminate any doubt as to what to expect or not expect if you choose to frequent them.